Los Angeles Nationality Discrimination Lawyer

Diversity has long been one of the strengths of the California workforce. When different people come together with a common cause or for a common goal, everyone benefits. Unfortunately, not all employers in the Golden State share that view. Instead, they look for ways to directly or indirectly limit or eliminate workforce diversity.

Employers use a number of approaches to fulfill this unscrupulous goal, and the experienced team at Litigation, P.C., has seen them all before. Our lawyer has upheld the rights of workers like you for many years, obtaining millions of dollars of compensation in the process. Since we put all our experience to work for you, we are usually able to obtain favorable out-of-court settlements in employment bias matters.

 

Hee Kim

Disparate Impact National Origin Discrimination

Anyone who has ever dealt with job discrimination before knows that job bias does not always have a malicious aspect. In fact, discrimination is often innocent or unintentional. But it is still illegal. Lawyers refer to such discrimination as disparate impact discrimination. Some policies unfairly target people in a protected class, such as:

  • National origin,
  • Ethnicity,
  • Religion,
  • Gender,
  • Age,
  • Disability, or
  • Sexual orientation.

The Supreme Court recently expanded the sexual orientation protected class, which was included in the 1964 Civil Rights Act, to include most people who are anywhere on the LGBTQ spectrum.

An English-only policy is perhaps the most common example of disparate impact national origin discrimination. Technically, these policies do not target people who were born or raised outside of the United States. But such a policy disproportionately affects such workers, especially if their English proficiency is limited.

Policy terms vary, but generally, these edicts require all workers to speak only English on the job. Frequently, these policies cite morale or another rather subjective foundation. Usually, such policies are only legal if the employee is in a customer-facing role and is either interfacing with a customer or a customer is within earshot.

Damages in such discrimination claims usually include lost wages and other related costs, such as job search or relocation expenses. A reasonable amount of front pay might be available as well.

Case Results

$1M Settlement

Employment Law

Employee faced racial and disability discrimination in addition to retaliation after reporting incidents at work

$250k Settlement

Employment Law

For an officer in law enforcement subjected to sexual harassment and failure to prevent harassment

$130k Settlement

Employment Law

Pre-litigation settlement for retaliation against whistleblower of non-profit

$93k Settlement

Employment Law

For an African American employee being disparately assigned harder work than the Hispanic employees in the same department, being subjected to racial slurs, and being unfairly written up after making complaints of racial discrimination and harassment

Settlement

Employment Law

For an employee after she faced cut hours, a written reprimand, and was fired after requesting reimbursement of personal expenses – settlement just months after filing a lawsuit

Settlement

Employment Law

For an employee for failing to provide reasonable accommodations for disabilities and unlawful retaliation – settlement just months after filing a lawsuit

Disclaimer: Illustrative examples of case types and outcomes. Attorneys cannot guarantee outcomes. Results are case-specific and depend on the true facts of the case. More information here.

Disparate Treatment Bias

Frequently, disparate impact discrimination is indirect and unintentional. Some employers have English-only policies because they do not think through all the possible implications of this policy. In contrast, disparate treatment discrimination is usually direct and intentional.

Unequal discipline is probably the most common disparate treatment example. Many employers put workers who have non-American heritage on a very short leash. Frequently, they believe that since California is an at-will employment state, they can use almost any excuse to terminate these employees. So, issues like minor absenteeism or a less-than-perfect performance review become a pretext for dismissal.

Because of the intentional nature of such discrimination, additional punitive damages are often available in disparate treatment claims.

To obtain this compensation, a plaintiff must first establish membership in a protected class, which in this case is national origin, and adverse action. That action is usually a refusal to hire or a termination. But it could also be a non-entry or exit level event, such as reassignment or demotion.

Employers can only derail the claim if they show a non-discriminatory reason for the adverse action which was not a pretext for illegal activity.

Count on a Tough-Minded Nationality Discrimination Attorney

The law guarantees equal opportunity for everyone. For a confidential consultation with an experienced lawyer, contact Litigation, P.C., at 424-284-2401 or online to learn about your legal options. We routinely handle matters throughout SoCal.

What Our Clients Are Saying

⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑
“I had the pleasure of working with Attorney Hee and his team on an employment matter, and I couldn’t be more satisfied with the experience. From the very beginning, Hee demonstrated a deep understanding of employment law and provided clear, strategic guidance tailored to my situation.

Throughout the process, Hee and his team were not only professional and knowledgeable but also approachable and genuinely invested in my case. Their responsiveness and attention to detail gave me confidence and peace of mind during what could have been a stressful time.

I highly recommend Attorney Hee to anyone in need of legal assistance. If my friends or family ever require legal support, I wouldn’t hesitate to refer them to Hee and his team. Their expertise, dedication, and client-focused approach truly set them apart.”

T. A. (Employment)

Google Logo

⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑
“I recently worked with Hee Kim to review an employment contract as I wanted a set of expert eyes on it. Hee was able to explain everything I had concerns about and was helpful in providing me comfort that I would receive what I expected. I would recommend working with him to anyone that needs an employment law professional.”

R. S. (Employment)

Google Logo

⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑
“Litigation, P.C. Law Firm represented me and they did a great job. Hee Kim did an awesome job making me feel cared for and he really listened to me. There were some mishaps on my end but they gave me all the tools I needed to find and present all my information needed for my case.
I had a great outcome and I was never judged by the firm which made me feel very comfortable. Mr. Kim was very friendly and made me feel right at home and taken care of.
I never had to the office and meet them and did everything online through Zoom and messaging when it was convenient for me.

I really recommend working with Hee Kim because he fought hard for me and after the case was closed I feel the best decisions were done and I believe having a piece of mind is the best thing for any client wanting to reach a just decision in their case.”

A. G. (Employment)

Google Logo

⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑
“This was the best email I sent when I was distressed and in need of legal services. The team at Litigation, P.C. Law Firm is the most professional, caring, honest, and tenacious group of people I have ever met in the world of law. Their expertise and advice was exactly what I needed when determining how I wanted to move forward with my case. They were able to settle my case in a timely manner for a fair amount. The process isn’t straight forward for everyone, and they were able to clearly communicate every step of the way, which left me feeling very supported, confident, and put me at ease. Once my case was settled, the payment was very swift. I would absolutely use their services again should I ever be in need. Thank you to the entire team.”

M. L. (Employment)

Google Logo