How Long Does a Lawsuit Take?

The length of time a lawsuit takes can vary greatly depending on several factors, such as the complexity of the case, the jurisdiction, the court’s schedule, and whether the case settles or goes to trial.

Short Answer: It depends. You can control what you do, but you can’t control the other side. The parties can settle the dispute at any time, regardless of whether an active lawsuit exists or not.

Hee Kim

Case Results

$3.4M Recovered

Business Litigation

Assisted in recovery ofthe balance of the purchase price for the sale of a business

$2.7M Verdict

Business Litigation

Assisted in obtaining jury verdict for breach of contract and conversion of business ownership, jury verdict only $25k less than requested

$342k Judgement

Business Litigation

For fraudulent inducement of loans, breach of contract, and defamation in false online posts and reviews

Disclaimer: Illustrative examples of case types and outcomes. Attorneys cannot guarantee outcomes. Results are case-specific and depend on the true facts of the case. More information here.

Civil Litigation Stages and Timeline

Pre-litigation (Investigation and Negotiation): Before a lawsuit is started with the filing of a complaint, the attorney should conduct an investigation to determine the merits of the client’s claims. This could take days or weeks, depending on the complexity of the case and amount of evidence to gather and review. Once that is concluded, a pre-litigation demand is typically sent to the potential defendants, alerting them of the claims, demanding a particular resolution, and inviting the defendants to mediation or some other form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) to avoid litigation. Depending on how quickly both sides can come to an agreement or gather additional evidence, this process may take days or months.

Filing and Initial Stages: Once the lawsuit is filed, the defendant is given a certain period to respond (usually 30 days). The time to respond does not start until the defendant is served with the summons. If you have difficulty locating the defendant for personal service, or the defendant is evading service, it make take weeks or months to locate the defendant and for a process server to attempt diligent service. If that is unsuccessful, you may have to file a motion for a court order to serve the summons by other means, such as by publication. Motions are heard depending on the availability of the judge, and this can take weeks or months.

  • If the defendant files a demurrer or otherwise challenges the complaint or service, such as a motion to quash the summons, the demurrer or motion is again heard depending on the availability of the judge. If the judge rules in the defendant’s favor, the judge may give you time to amend or fix the errors, and then give the defendant additional time to answer the complaint.
  • Once a defendant finally “answers”, the defendant is essentially “appearing” to defend the lawsuit. The lawsuit will now be “at issue” once all the defendants have appeared.

Written Discovery: Typically, after all the defendants have appeared, discovery begins, which is the process where both sides exchange information and evidence.

  • Discovery usually takes several months, or sometimes years, depending on the complexity of the case and the amount of evidence that needs to be gathered and reviewed.
  • The California Code of Civil procedure controls when you can start “propounding discovery”, meaning sending written discovery. Most parties wait until the case is at issue.
  • The responding party to any propounded written discovery has 30 days (plus time for service), to respond. Extensions to respond, however, are routinely granted between attorneys to allow more time to respond. Many jurisdictions and judges encourage or even have local rules or orders requiring reasonable requests for extensions to be granted by the propounding party.
  • Subpoenas may also sent out to third parties who are not involved in the lawsuit if those third parties have relevant information and evidence in their possession, custody, or control.
  • Motions may be necessary if a party fails to timely respond, or provides insufficient responses. Such motions typically require a “meet and confer” process between the parties, to try to informally resolve the disputes without any motion practice. A motion to compel further responses must be filed within 45 days of receipt of verified responses. Some jurisdictions or judges require the parties to first attend an informal discovery conference, however, before filing a motion, and “pause” the deadline to file such a motion. An informal discovery conference, or IDC, is a meeting with the judge to try to informally resolve the discovery disputes, and the scheduling of an IDC depends on the availability of the judge.
  • Each time additional or “supplemental” responses are provided, or more written discovery is propounded, this entire process is repeated.

Depositions: During the written discovery phase, depositions are also typically taken by all the parties in the lawsuit.

  • A deposition is a process for a party to obtain the sworn testimony of a witness under the penalty of perjury prior to trial. Minimally, each party will likely take the deposition of the other party. A deposition of any other percipient witnesses may also be required.
  • Depositions are usually mutually scheduled depending on the availability of the witness and all the attorneys. This can take weeks or months.
  • If a witness fails to appear at a deposition, fails to produce documents at the deposition, or refuses to answer questions at a deposition, then a motion may be necessary. This again depends on the availability of the judge.

Mediation: Before trial, most cases go to mediation or another type of ADR. A neutral party, such as a retired judge or lawyer, tries to help the parties come to an agreement without the need to go to trial. Most parties agree to some sort of ADR after some or all discovery has taken place, so that the parties are aware of all the evidence, and the weaknesses and strengths of each party’s position. Scheduling a mediation depends on the availability of the mediator, the parties, and their attorneys. This can be weeks, or even months, for popular mediators.

Motions: During the discovery phase, there may be various motions filed, including dispositive ones, such as a motion for summary judgment, which claims a trial is not even necessary because there are no disputed issues of material fact. All motions will be heard subject to the availability of the judge, and can take weeks or months.

Pre-Trial Conference or Final Status Conference: Before the case actually goes to trial, there are often motions filed by both parties to resolve certain issues, such as whether certain evidence should be admissible at trial. Each jurisdiction or judge may have different local rules or standing orders that affect the deadlines and timing of these motions. The parties (through their attorneys), and the judge, also review all the “housekeeping” matters to ensure that the case is ready for trial. This means, for example, making sure all the evidence is in a form presentable to the jury, all the witnesses are available to testify, and all the proposed jury instructions and verdict forms have been submitted.

Trial: If the case proceeds to trial, the length of the trial depends on the complexity of the case. Most cases take a few days to a couple of weeks. The trial is scheduled depending on the availability of the judge. At the beginning of the lawsuit, a judge typically holds a case management conference or trial setting conference, to set the initial date for trial to start. Most judges do not have availability for a trial until months or even years down the road, and trials are typically set for one or two years away to ensure the parties have sufficient time to conduct all the discovery necessary for trial. Even so, trial dates are regularly continued for various reasons. For example, judges regularly set many cases for trial on the same date, because not all cases go to trial, such as when they settle. If more than one case is ready to go to trial on the same date, the older case usually takes priority, so your trial may be further delayed because of the judge’s unavailability.

Post-Trial: After a trial, there may be appeals, which can extend the overall timeline by several months or years.

Settlement of a Civil Dispute

  • A dispute can settle any time, from the pre-litigation stage, to the post-trial stage. This depends on whether the parties can come to an agreement.
  • Statistics show that the majority of lawsuits settle and do not go to trial. Although the data is not always comprehensive and varies, it does show that trials in general have been on a decline over the past century.

How Long do Lawsuits Take in California

  • In the 2024 court statistics report for the 2022-2023 fiscal year, according to the data from the Judicial Council of California, approximately 80% of unlimited civil cases were disposed before trial.
  • From the remaining 20%, only 2% went to a jury trial. The rest were resolved by a bench trial or trial de novo.
  • In the same time period, over 50% of active lawsuits were “cleared” in one way or another.
  • In the same time period, the average case processing time to being disposed was less than 75% of cases within 12 months, slightly more than 75% of cases within 18 months, and less than 90% within 24 months.

Conclusion

Our team at Litigation, P.C., tailors our representation to fit your goals during the litigation process. For a confidential consultation with an experienced civil litigation attorney, contact Litigation, P.C., at 424-284-2401 or online to learn about your legal options. We routinely handle matters throughout SoCal.

Los Angeles Civil Litigation Lawyer Reviews

⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑
“I had the pleasure of working with Attorney Hee and his team on an employment matter, and I couldn’t be more satisfied with the experience. From the very beginning, Hee demonstrated a deep understanding of employment law and provided clear, strategic guidance tailored to my situation.

Throughout the process, Hee and his team were not only professional and knowledgeable but also approachable and genuinely invested in my case. Their responsiveness and attention to detail gave me confidence and peace of mind during what could have been a stressful time.

I highly recommend Attorney Hee to anyone in need of legal assistance. If my friends or family ever require legal support, I wouldn’t hesitate to refer them to Hee and his team. Their expertise, dedication, and client-focused approach truly set them apart.”

T. A. (Employment)

Google Logo

⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑
“I was extremely ill and needed an attorney for a civil matter in CA. My local attorney referred me to Hee Kim and his firm, Litigation, P.C. Law Firm. Hee and his team quickly followed up with a scheduled zoom call. During the call he carefully documented the situation and helped establish the objectives and best course of action.

Fortunately, he was correct on his initial assessment and followed through with speed and precision that resulted saving me 6-figures or more. I will be recommending Hee to my friends and business associates for any legal entanglements in CA. Use your power of choice wisely and check with them before deciding on a direction.”

S. H. (Fraud, Torts)

Google Logo

⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑
“Working with Hee Kim and Litigation, PC has been an exceptional experience. He consistently keeps me informed on every aspect of my case, providing clear details on costs, pros, and benefits of each option. His dedication to my interests is evident at every step, and he ensures I am fully involved in the process.

Attending court hearings with him is reassuring as he remembers every detail and effectively refutes the other side’s claims. His preparation for depositions is impeccable, always calling out any inconsistencies. His strategic advice on when to take specific actions or make motions has been spot on.

His litigation approach is unmatched, and he is highly aggressive in fighting for his clients. He prioritizes his clients, making each one feel like his only case. I highly recommend Hee and his firm to anyone seeking strong legal representation! “

S. A. (Business, Fraud)

Google Logo

⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑
“Litigation, P.C. Law Firm represented me and they did a great job. Hee Kim did an awesome job making me feel cared for and he really listened to me. There were some mishaps on my end but they gave me all the tools I needed to find and present all my information needed for my case.
I had a great outcome and I was never judged by the firm which made me feel very comfortable. Mr. Kim was very friendly and made me feel right at home and taken care of.
I never had to the office and meet them and did everything online through Zoom and messaging when it was convenient for me.

I really recommend working with Hee Kim because he fought hard for me and after the case was closed I feel the best decisions were done and I believe having a piece of mind is the best thing for any client wanting to reach a just decision in their case.”

A. G. (Employment)

Google Logo

⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑
“This was the best email I sent when I was distressed and in need of legal services. The team at Litigation, P.C. Law Firm is the most professional, caring, honest, and tenacious group of people I have ever met in the world of law. Their expertise and advice was exactly what I needed when determining how I wanted to move forward with my case. They were able to settle my case in a timely manner for a fair amount.

The process isn’t straight forward for everyone, and they were able to clearly communicate every step of the way, which left me feeling very supported, confident, and put me at ease. Once my case was settled, the payment was very swift. I would absolutely use their services again should I ever be in need. Thank you to the entire team.”

M. L. (Employment)

Google Logo

⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑
“We have retained Hee and Litigation, P.C. Law Firm for all of our business legal needs for over four years, and we cannot recommend them highly enough.

Hee is not only knowledgeable and experienced but also incredibly thorough and detail-oriented. He meticulously reviewed all aspects of our business legal challenges, identifying potential issues and opportunities that we had not considered.

His strategic approach and ability to think several steps ahead gave us a tremendous sense of confidence and security throughout the entire process, especially the trial.

During the trial, he was fully prepared every single day, explaining his thought process to us about why he was asking or not asking certain questions to all the witnesses, raising timely objections with majority of them being sustained by the Judge…At the end of the day he wanted to make sure that we put all of our ammo on the table and we were able to successfully do that.

Hee also communicates very clearly and has been patient in explaining legal jargon and complex concepts in a way that was easy to understand, ensuring that we were well-informed and comfortable with every decision we made.

If you are looking for a lawyer who will provide exceptional legal counsel and support, we highly recommend Hee and Litigation, P.C. Law Firm.”

S. A. (Business, Fraud)

Google Logo